Argentum’s Co-Investment Playbook: Turning Risk into High-Conviction Opportunities in Private Equity

As the private equity landscape evolves, co-investments have emerged as a compelling strategy for LPs seeking greater control, reduced fees, and the potential for enhanced returns. In this exclusive interview, Jørgen Blystad, Investment Director at Argentum, shares insights into the firm’s co-investment philosophy, key selection criteria, and how Argentum mitigates risks while leveraging its deep GP relationships across Europe. From buyout strategies to ESG integration, Blystad sheds light on the nuanced approach Argentum takes to ensure long-term success in a competitive market.

Argentum is a specialized asset manager with over €3 billion in assets under management, dedicated exclusively to private equity since 2001. With deep expertise in evaluating and selecting top-tier private equity funds and fund managers—spanning both venture and buyout strategies—Argentum invests on behalf of the Norwegian state and a range of professional investors, including pension funds, foundations, and family offices.

 What are Argentum’s key criteria when selecting co-investment opportunities? 

Argentum searches for co-invest opportunities in high-quality assets with limited downside risk while still maintaining high upside potential, managed by GPs that we trust and have a strong track record. 

What are the primary risks and benefits for limited LPs engaging in co-investments? 

There are benefits as we see it in terms of having the opportunity to achieve alpha returns by selecting better-than-average PE investment cases and by reducing the typically high fees associated with PE. 

Primary risks include possible negative selection, coupled with the fact that co-investments tend to have a relatively high investment size.

Argentum primarily focuses on buyouts with some allocation to VC funds. Are there differences in your approach when considering co-investments in these two types of funds? 

We typically favor buyout cases, because we see better risk/return there. We have experience with VC co-investments quite far back in time, but have moved away from it since it is difficult to identify which companies that will emerge as future winners. 

 How does Argentum mitigate potential risks such as adverse selection, concentration risk, and execution challenges in co-investments? 

We benefit from our extensive investment experience when doing our own considerations based on the GP’s due diligence. Our goal is to turn the concentration risk into a positive factor, investing only in high-conviction cases. We have a specialized team that works on co-invest opportunities, for smooth execution on our side. 

Are there specific European markets or sectors where Argentum has developed a particularly strong network and expertise in co-investments? 

I would say that we like companies that uses technology as a key part of the business model. In terms of geography, we are looking for the most attractive opportunities in Europe and have done co-investments in all of our key regions. 

How do you identify and build relationships with GPs that align with Argentum’s co-investment strategy? 

Argentum has a portfolio of about 100 GP relationships, where we constantly have our eyes open for co-investment opportunities.

How does Argentum integrate ESG considerations into its co-investment decision-making process? 

ESG considerations is an integral part of our investment process, and we perform analysis of ESG factors before any investment. 

Blog

Other news you might be also interested in

Constantijn van Oranje on Europe’s Global Edge: Aligning Capital, Talent, and Policy to Lead in AI, Deep Tech, and Digital Sovereignty

As Special Envoy at Techleap, Constantijn van Oranje-Nassau has long championed Europe’s ambition to lead in innovation. In this exclusive interview, he shares his outlook for 2025 and beyond — from the rebound of the IPO market to the rise of deep tech, defense, and AI. He discusses the urgent need for Europe to scale its impact-driven startups, build a more unified tech policy, and rethink investment models to secure long-term competitiveness in critical technologies. With insights on transatlantic dynamics, regulatory hurdles, and the talent imperative, Constantijn outlines a bold vision for how VCs, governments, and industry must align to shape Europe’s future on the global stage.

VenCap: “Q1 2025 Deal Flow Up 40% YoY - The VC Secondary Opportunity”

With deal flow up 40% year-on-year in Q1 2025, the venture capital secondary market is seeing significant growth and rising interest from investors. In this interview, Matt Russell, Investment Director at VenCap, outlines how the firm is capitalizing on this trend. He explains VenCap’s disciplined strategy for accessing top-tier VC-backed companies, the advantages of secondaries over primaries, and why the current market environment presents compelling opportunities for those with the right capital and insight.

European Venture Capital: Challenges and Opportunities from a U.S. Investor’s Perspective

The venture capital market continues to reset after the highs of 2021-22, and while investment activity is picking up, LPs remain cautious about new commitments. In this insightful conversation, Karey Barker, Founder & Managing Director of Cross Creek, shares her perspective on the European VC landscape, the opportunities in secondary markets, and Cross Creek’s investment strategy as both an LP and GP. From the differences between European and US VC ecosystems to the key challenges in due diligence, Karey offers a deep dive into the sectors showing the most promise, the impact of sovereign support in Europe, and how Cross Creek balances investments between established and emerging managers. She also shares her outlook on M&A and IPO trends heading into 2025 and the factors that could shape liquidity across global markets.